Styleguide V1
This commit is contained in:
457
StilVorlagen/Seminar System Imunology - Ausarbeitung.md
Normal file
457
StilVorlagen/Seminar System Imunology - Ausarbeitung.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,457 @@
|
||||
Seminar System Immunology
|
||||
|
||||
Experimental techniques to acquire
|
||||
high‐throughput quantitative data
|
||||
|
||||
Author
|
||||
|
||||
Christoph Schwörer
|
||||
|
||||
Betreuer
|
||||
|
||||
Sven Nahnsen
|
||||
|
||||
13.11.2008
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
1. Introduction
|
||||
|
||||
In the past few years System Biology has emerged from the field of computational biology. The
|
||||
processing power of new computers and the development of new techniques led to new
|
||||
approaches in the understanding the complete picture of what happens inside a single cell or
|
||||
an entire organism. Instead of looking at one particular reaction, interaction of between single
|
||||
proteins or even a whole pathway we now want to look at the status of a whole cell at once.
|
||||
Thus we can come to understand the interaction of whole Pathways or the complete cellular
|
||||
reaction to a certain stimulus.
|
||||
|
||||
But to build these new models we need reliable statistics. In order to get to these reliable
|
||||
statistics we need many sets of data from different sources. One of the reasons is why there
|
||||
have been several new techniques developed to acquire data in huge amounts. Which is why
|
||||
they are called high throughput methods. Because they process whole experiments at once,
|
||||
like screening the genome for a certain sequence. This report will now give an introduction to
|
||||
the basic techniques used to prepare these high throughput methods as well as an introduction
|
||||
to the most important high throughput methods.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
2. Basic techniques
|
||||
|
||||
In order to conduct high throughput experiments we have to prepare them carefully. This
|
||||
means we have to separate cells from one and another if we want to test only certain cells with
|
||||
specific properties. Or we have to separate certain compartments within a cell if we want to
|
||||
test them alone. On the other hand we have to provide certain cells with these wanted
|
||||
properties in order to do comparison tests. In this chapter we will now discuss the basic
|
||||
techniques used to prepare high throughput experiments.
|
||||
|
||||
2.1 Restriction Enzymes / Gel Electrophoresis
|
||||
|
||||
Gel electrophoresis can be used for
|
||||
two different purposes. On the one
|
||||
hand it can be used to identify the
|
||||
relationship between different cell
|
||||
lines on the other it can be used to
|
||||
break down the isolate short strands
|
||||
of DNA for further use.
|
||||
|
||||
The first step in this procedure is to
|
||||
break down the very large strands of
|
||||
cellular DNA into short fragments.
|
||||
This is accomplished by restriction
|
||||
enzymes.
|
||||
enzymes
|
||||
Restriction
|
||||
recognize short sequences of double
|
||||
stranded DNA, which are typically
|
||||
about 10 to 12 basepairs long, and
|
||||
these specific
|
||||
cut
|
||||
sequences. There exist about several hundred different restriction enzymes which all have
|
||||
different recognition sites.
|
||||
|
||||
Figure 1: Agarose Gel with luminescent DNA strands
|
||||
|
||||
the DNA at
|
||||
|
||||
After the DNA is completely digested by a restriction enzyme the solution is put on an agarose
|
||||
gel. The gel is then applied with an electrical field so DNA strands are pulled to the electrodes.
|
||||
In dependency of their length and charge the different DNA strands will travel at different
|
||||
speed so that after a given time they separate and reach different points in the gel. With the
|
||||
addition of luminescent chemicals the strands can be made visible so that they form a pattern
|
||||
of strands on the agarose gel (see figure 1)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
2.2 1D/2D Protein Gels
|
||||
|
||||
Gel electrophoresis can not only be used to
|
||||
separate DNA strands but it can also be used
|
||||
to separate proteins. The problem is that
|
||||
there are so many proteins within a cell with
|
||||
approximately the same size that it is almost
|
||||
impossible to separate them by size only.
|
||||
That is why one has to use another criterion
|
||||
to separate the proteins further. In this case
|
||||
2D electrophoresis uses
|
||||
the different
|
||||
isoelectric points of the proteins which they
|
||||
reach at different ph‐values (O’Farrel 1975).
|
||||
In the procedure the first step is to linearize
|
||||
the proteins because in their natural tertiary
|
||||
structure they won’t fit through the pores of
|
||||
the gel. So all the intramolecular bonds which
|
||||
give the protein its form have to be broken.
|
||||
(E.g. H‐H bonds or sulfuric bonds) The next step is to separate the proteins by size as it is done
|
||||
with the DNA on a polyacrylamid gel which is applied with an electrical field. After the second
|
||||
step another gel with a ph gradient is put on the first and because of their charge the proteins
|
||||
begin to travel to their isoelectric point. Afterwards the gel with the previously luminescent
|
||||
marked proteins is visualized.
|
||||
|
||||
Figure 2: 2D Protein gel. Each dot represents one protein.
|
||||
|
||||
2.3 Cloning Vectors an DNA Libraries
|
||||
|
||||
Cloning Vectors are short DNA fragments (up to 19 kbp), as for example the ones we have
|
||||
retrieved with the restriction enzyme/gel electrophoresis technique. To analyze these DNA
|
||||
fragments and the genes on them we have to bring them into a living environment. Because
|
||||
DNA is the same in all living beings they can be inserted into bacteria which then express the
|
||||
proteins encoded on the DNA strands.
|
||||
|
||||
This is achieved by transformation where the DNA fragments, which are called cloning vectors,
|
||||
are added to a solution of bacteria cells. The cloning vectors can now penetrate the cells
|
||||
surface and get into the cell. There the original bacterial DNA plasmid is cut with the same
|
||||
restriction enzyme used to obtain the cloning vectors. Now there is a chance that the cloning
|
||||
vector is inserted into the plasmid by recombining the cut locations called sticky ends.
|
||||
|
||||
After the cloning vector is inserted the cells proliferate and are later separated by the newly
|
||||
resistances)
|
||||
new
|
||||
obtained
|
||||
|
||||
properties
|
||||
|
||||
antibiotic
|
||||
|
||||
through
|
||||
|
||||
DNA.
|
||||
|
||||
(e.g.
|
||||
|
||||
the
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
2.4 Hybridization and Blotting
|
||||
|
||||
Another basic problem is to identify whether a specific DNA sequences or protein is present in a
|
||||
given DNA/protein sample.
|
||||
|
||||
For DNA the technique at hand is the so called Southern Blotting (Southern 1975). A given DNA
|
||||
sample is first put through a gel electrophoresis to separate the DNA strands by size and is then
|
||||
washed on a nylon patch to fixate the strands. Afterwards the nylon patch is incubated at up to
|
||||
80°C to break the hydrogen bonds so that the DNA gets single stranded. Now the nylon patch is
|
||||
washed again with a solution of hybridization probes, which are short fragments of the
|
||||
complementary DNA we want to test for. These probes are radioactively marked and will
|
||||
hybridize with the single stranded target DNA. Now the nylon patch is pressed against a X‐ray
|
||||
film where the hybridized probes will be visualized.
|
||||
|
||||
To test for the existence of specific proteins a similar technique is used which is named Western
|
||||
Blotting. Like Southern Blotting first the given protein sample is separated using 2D
|
||||
electrophoresis and then washed onto a carrier patch. In order to test for the targeted protein
|
||||
this technique uses marked antibodies as probes. Those marked probes can then again be
|
||||
visualized with an X‐ray film.
|
||||
|
||||
2.5 Centrifugation
|
||||
|
||||
One of the oldest techniques used for the separation of cell compartments is centrifugation.
|
||||
There the centrifugal force is used for the separation. More exactly the fact that molecules with
|
||||
different density will have different sedimentation rates. So that after a given time the
|
||||
compartments will be separated. Hereby the Sedimentation rate is measured in Svedenberg
|
||||
m
|
||||
units:
|
||||
|
||||
1(
|
||||
|
||||
r
|
||||
|
||||
r
|
||||
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
/
|
||||
|
||||
=
|
||||
|
||||
S
|
||||
|
||||
V
|
||||
²
|
||||
|
||||
w
|
||||
|
||||
r
|
||||
|
||||
=
|
||||
|
||||
par
|
||||
|
||||
sol
|
||||
f
|
||||
|
||||
Where m is the mass of the particle, f the friction of the medium and r sol/ r par the density of
|
||||
the medium/particle
|
||||
|
||||
2.6 Column Chromatography
|
||||
|
||||
In column chromatography the molecules one wants to separate are washed through a solid carrier
|
||||
material. Because of the different size and shape of the different molecules they arrive at different
|
||||
times at the bottom of the column. A more sophisticated method is also available where the carrier
|
||||
material is spiked with antibodies for a target protein. The antibodies will bind to target protein and
|
||||
hold it back while everything else is washed through. Then a solution is washed through which will
|
||||
loosen the protein form the antibodies and the protein can be retrieved.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
-
|
||||
3. Advanced Techniques
|
||||
|
||||
After having prepared the proteins or DNA we want to test we now need to have methods so
|
||||
that we can retrieve data from a large number of parallel experiments. To get confirmation or
|
||||
even more data to create statistics we need to do several of the same experiment at once. The
|
||||
techniques used for this purpose are called high throughput experiments because of the sheer
|
||||
amount of parallel processing and data we get.
|
||||
|
||||
3.1 PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction)
|
||||
|
||||
PCR is not an experiment to retrieve data
|
||||
but more a method to amplificate DNA we
|
||||
already have prepared to an amount where
|
||||
it can be used in later high throughput
|
||||
techniques. (Saiki et al. 1985) Simply put
|
||||
PCR duplicates the amount of DNA per
|
||||
cycle. The first step is to heat the DNA
|
||||
solution so that the hydrogen bonds
|
||||
between the two DNA strands is broken an
|
||||
the DNA gets single stranded. Then primers
|
||||
are added to the solution which will
|
||||
hybridize with the single stranded DNA
|
||||
while the solution is cooling down. Now the
|
||||
DNA‐polymerase kicks in and extends the
|
||||
|
||||
single stranded DNA with primer to a new
|
||||
double stranded DNA strand. This leads to the duplication of DNA with each cycle so that after
|
||||
a few cycles there is sufficient DNA to use in a high throughput experiment.
|
||||
|
||||
Figure 3: PCR
|
||||
|
||||
3.2 DNA-/Protein Chips (Microarrays)
|
||||
|
||||
Microarrays are a newly developed method to test the expressions of thousands of genes at
|
||||
once (Cahill and Nordhoff 2003). There are two different types of microarrays, DNA‐chips and
|
||||
protein‐chips. While DNA chips test for the occurrence of mRNA in a cell, protein‐chips test for
|
||||
the occurrence of proteins. Both methods applied to the same cell will lead to different
|
||||
expression patterns because there are several factors influencing the translation from mRNA to
|
||||
proteins. Both methods work in a similar way.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
DNA chips are carrier spotted with cDNA primers
|
||||
from exons which one can get from a DNA library.
|
||||
Those chips are then incubated with DNA reversely
|
||||
transcribed from the target cells mRNA. This DNA is
|
||||
also marked with fluorescing dye so that the
|
||||
coloring of the chip reveals the expression of the
|
||||
correspondent genes. As you can see in fig.4 with the
|
||||
use of different dyes one can also do comparrison
|
||||
expereriments on one microarray.
|
||||
|
||||
Protein‐chips on the other hand are carriers spotted
|
||||
with binding partners for proteins which can be
|
||||
other proteins, antibodies, DNA or drugs. But
|
||||
protein‐chips are not that easy to apply because
|
||||
different proteins have different optimal conditions
|
||||
(e.g ph‐value) so that one has to find a sufficient
|
||||
compromise to acquire usable data.
|
||||
|
||||
3.3 Yeast Two-hybridization
|
||||
|
||||
Figure 4: Heatplot of a comparative microarray with two
|
||||
sources
|
||||
|
||||
The yeast‐two‐hybrid system is a technique used to test if two proteins, prey and bait, interact.
|
||||
(Uetz et al.2000) It uses the fact that the Gala4 Transcription factor consists of two parts. Those
|
||||
two parts are fused to either of the proteins one wants to test. If bait and prey do interact they
|
||||
come close together. When this happens the two parts of Gala4 TF also come close enough
|
||||
together so that it can
|
||||
the
|
||||
promote
|
||||
expression of a given
|
||||
reporter gene which is
|
||||
promoted by Gala4.
|
||||
For screening purposes
|
||||
this technique can be
|
||||
|
||||
Figure 5: Yeast-two-hybrid system
|
||||
|
||||
extended to a high
|
||||
throughput technique
|
||||
|
||||
by adding multiple prey proteins or even multiple bait proteins.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
3.4 Mass Spectrometry
|
||||
|
||||
Mass spectrometry allows the identification of proteins through their mass/charge ratio
|
||||
(Abersold & Mann 2003). In a mass spectrometer basically the digested protein is ionized by an
|
||||
ion source and the fragments are accelerated through a magnet onto a mass analyzer. The
|
||||
detector then delivers a fingerprint of the
|
||||
containing fragments. This fingerprint is now
|
||||
compared to the precomputed theoretical
|
||||
fingerprints from a protein database.
|
||||
|
||||
There are different methods available for
|
||||
the ionization or the mass analysis. The two
|
||||
methods for ionization are ESI (Electrospray
|
||||
ionization) which is used to ionize proteins
|
||||
out of solutions and MALD (matrix assisted
|
||||
laser desorption/ionization) which is used
|
||||
on proteins in dry crystals.
|
||||
|
||||
Figure 6: Mass spectrometer
|
||||
|
||||
For the mass analysis there exist four basic
|
||||
types. The first is the sector field analyzer
|
||||
which is depicted in fig.6. It measures the
|
||||
deviation of a fragment from its trajectory
|
||||
according to the fact that heavier fragments
|
||||
won’t be deviated so much then lighter
|
||||
fragments. The second type of analyzer is the TOF (time of flight) analyzer which measures the
|
||||
time between entrance in the magnetic field and impact on the analyzer. This type also bases
|
||||
on the fact that heavier fragments won’t accelerate so fast then lighter ones because of their
|
||||
inertia. The third type is the quadrupole which allows only fragments to pass that have a
|
||||
specific mass/charge ratio. The quadrupole is used to measure the quantity of the targeted
|
||||
fragment. The last type is the Fourier transform ion cyclotron. Here the ions are accelerated in
|
||||
circular magnetic field. It measures the radius and the frequency of the flying fragments and
|
||||
computes from that the mass fingerprint. This is also by far the most accurate and sensitive
|
||||
type of analyzer.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
3.5 Transgenic Animals
|
||||
|
||||
Transgenic animals are animals who’s DNA have been altered. Either by inserting foreign DNA
|
||||
or by willingly cutting out specific genes. Either of both happens with the firs stem cell before it
|
||||
begins to proliferate. There are two ways of getting the foreign DNA into the cell. The first is to
|
||||
directly inject it into the cell, which is called DNA microinjection. The second is to use an altered
|
||||
retrovirus which infects the cell.
|
||||
|
||||
Transgenic animals are mostly used as knockout animals where one specific gene is cut out to
|
||||
identify its function.
|
||||
|
||||
3.6 RNA Interference
|
||||
|
||||
RNA interference is mechanism inhibiting DNA expression where a double stranded RNA has
|
||||
been inserted into a cell (Fire et al. 1998). It is part of the cells defense system against viruses or
|
||||
other genomic material. The double stranded RNA is recognized by an endoribonuclease called
|
||||
DICER. DICER cuts the dsRNA into short strings (~20bps) which are then assembled to RISC
|
||||
(RNA‐induced silencing complex). The RISC complex then recognizes the correspondent mRNA
|
||||
and cuts it into short pieces which are then digested thus inhibiting the translation of this
|
||||
mRNA.
|
||||
|
||||
In opposition to transgenic animals this method is usable in high throughput experiments
|
||||
where many cells and/or genes can be inhibited at once. The only problem with RNA
|
||||
interference studies is that longer dsRNA strands lead to an interferon response in mammalian
|
||||
cells. This is why in these cases synthetically produced siRNA strands are used.(Dykxoorn et al.
|
||||
2003)
|
||||
|
||||
4. Discussion and Conclusion
|
||||
|
||||
As shown in the chapters above there are several techniques available to acquire high
|
||||
throughput data. The most upcoming are surely the microarray and the DNA interference
|
||||
techniques. What all techniques have in common is that they are very expensive to conduct
|
||||
either in the individual experiment like microarrays or in the needed infrastructure and
|
||||
machinery like a mass spectrometer. What they also have in common is that every one of them
|
||||
needs a lot of processing power to analyze the results. Not only to fit the data into models but
|
||||
simply to handle the sheer amount of data. This processing power is only available to everyone
|
||||
since the last few years. As research goes on and the field of system biology will surely grow it
|
||||
stands to hope that in mass production the techniques will be more affordable.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
5. References
|
||||
|
||||
5.1 Literature
|
||||
|
||||
Cahill, D.J. and Nordhoff, E. Protein arrays and their role in proteomics (2003) Adv. Biochem.
|
||||
Eng. Biotechnol. 83, 177‐87.
|
||||
|
||||
Dykxoorn, D.M., Nivina, C.D. and Sharp, P.A. Killing the messenger: short RNAs that silence gene
|
||||
expression.(2003) Nat. Rec. Mol. Cell. Biol. 4, 457-67
|
||||
|
||||
E.Klipp, R.Herwig, A.Kowald, C.Wierling, H.Lehrbach
|
||||
System Biology in Practice. Concepts,Implementation and Application, (2005)Wiley-VCH 109-
|
||||
133
|
||||
|
||||
Fire, A., Xu, S., Montgomery, M.K., Kostas, S.A., Driver, S.E., and Mello, C.C. Potent and specific
|
||||
genetic interference by double stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elgeans (1998) Nature 391, 806‐
|
||||
11
|
||||
|
||||
O’Farrel. P.H. High resolution two-dimensional electrophpresis of proteins(1975) J. Biol. Chem
|
||||
250, 4007-4021
|
||||
|
||||
Ruedi Aebersold & Matthias Mann
|
||||
Mass spectrometry-based proteomics (2003) Nature 422, 198-207
|
||||
|
||||
Saiki, R.K., Scharf, S., Faloona, F., Mullis,K.B., Horn, G.T., Erlich, H.A. and Arnheim, N. Enzamtic
|
||||
amplification of beta globin genomic sequences and restriction site analysis for diagnosis of
|
||||
sickle cell anemia.(1985) Science 230, 1350-1354
|
||||
|
||||
Southern, E.M. Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel
|
||||
electrophpresis (1975) J. Mol. Biol. 98, 503-517
|
||||
|
||||
Uetz, P., Giot, L., Cagney, G. Mansfield, T.A., Judson, R.S., Knight, J.R., Lockshon, D., Narayan, V.,
|
||||
Srinivasan, M., Pochart, P., Qureshi‐Emili, A., Li, Y., Goodwin, B., Conover, D., Kalbfleisch, T.,
|
||||
Vijayadamo‐Dar, G., Yang, M. Johnston, M., Fields, S., and Rothenberg J.M. A comprehensive
|
||||
analysis of protein-protein interaction in Saccharomyces cerivisiae (2000) Nature 403, 623‐7
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
5.2 Figures
|
||||
|
||||
Fig. 1: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/60/Gel_electrophoresis_2.jpg
|
||||
|
||||
Fig. 2: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/de/b/b2/2D‐Gel.jpg
|
||||
|
||||
Fig. 3: http://www.obgynacademy.com/basicsciences/fetology/genetics/images/pcr.png
|
||||
|
||||
Fig. 4: http://www.bio.davidson.edu/COURSES/genomics/2005/Durnbaugh/microarray.jpg
|
||||
|
||||
Fig. 5: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/e/e4/Three‐hybrid‐system.svg
|
||||
|
||||
Fig. 6:
|
||||
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b8/Mass_spectrometer_schematics.png
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user